DCS F-14 & RIO Gaming

F-14B Fuel Consumption Model – Part III: CAP Loadout

Having been through the data-collection process already, before diving into the data, a brief recap. The values gathered are displayed in the following sample:

  • Fuel Flow: per engine;
  • Units of AoA: exported via DCS-BIOS;
  • Left and Right Elevators: the values may differ slightly due to the wind;
  • Wing sweep: from 20° to 68°;
  • Degrees of AoA, RPM, PITCH and IAS: collected from the DCS, not from the avionics;
  • Manoeuvring Flaps: status of the automatic auxiliary flaps, either 0% or 100% (the latter means extended).

For instance:

I collected data between 5,000ft and 35,000ft with 5,000ft steps; starting at a Ground speed of 230kts, up to 600kts. In some occasions I decided to do not collect some data; for instance, at 35,000kts a GS of 230kts (IAS ~130kts) is unsustainable and prone to stalling.

I added both normal charts and the same values plotted with the manoeuvring flaps speed, sometimes switching to logarithmic scale. The manoeuvring flaps value displayed is the speed at which the flaps are retracted.

Ground Speed vs Fuel Flow

GS vs Fuel Flow
GS vs Fuel Flow + Manoeuvring Flaps

Mach vs Fuel Flow

Not every Mach interval is available for each series. The second chart shows the missing values plotted by Google Drive and the manoeuvring flaps status (columns).

Mach vs Fuel Flow
Mach vs Fuel Flow + Manoeuvring Flaps

IAS vs Fuel Flow

Same as before, some values are missing and are automatically plotted by GD in the second chart, along with the manoeuvring flaps status.

IAS vs Fuel Flow
IAS vs Fuel Flow + Manoeuvring Flaps

GS and Mach vs UAoA

GS vs UAoA
Mach vs UAoA + Manoeuvring Flaps

GS and Mach vs Wings Sweep angle

GS vs Wings sweep
Mach vs Wings sweep + Manoeuvring Flaps

GS and Mach vs Left Elevator

GS vs Left Elevator
Mach vs Left Elevator + Manoeuvring Flaps


Generally speaking, the fuel consumption is fairly linear and predictable for altitudes between 5000ft and 15000ft (taking into account that the values gathered change depending on of many external factors, such as the wind).
Starting at 20000ft, the behaviour changes. At low speed, the trend is similar to 15,000ft and lower, but reached a speed of ~Mach .63 the fuel consumption decreases, reaches the lowest at Mach circa .70 and then raises again. It then exponentially increases until the AB comes into action, at that point the increase of fuel consumption over the speed gain is minimal.
On top of that, the Wings Sweep angle behaves in a completely different way depending on the altitude. Two trends can be clearly defined: 5000ft→15000ft and 20000ft→35000ft. Interestingly, no matter the altitude, the wings are fully reversed as the speed gets closer to Mach 1.00.

Cruising at 8.5 UAoA

8.5 UAoA is marked on the UAoA indicator as the “Cruise value”. These following are the charts of Speed vs Fuel Consumption, with the speeds closer to UAoA 8.5 plotted as columns.

NOTE: Values close to 8.5 UAoA are sometimes reached twice, usually as the manoeuvring flaps are retracted. I considered only the first occurrence in the following charts.

GS vs Fuel Consumption + UAoA 8.5
Mach vs Fuel Consumption + UAoA 8.5
Mach vs Fuel Consumption + UAoA 8.5: DETAIL

UAoA 8.5 seems to be a fairly good reference value where the fuel consumption is fairly low. The only exception is 35,000ft where the fuel usage is lower at ~Mach .70.

Using this fuel consumption model

This model is integrated into the next release of the Mission Datacard Generator.

MDC Generator 1.2 – Fuel Consumption Breakdown (WIP)

The fuel breakdown has the purpose of helping the Mission Planner to define Bingo fuel and set AAR along the route, if necessary. Since it is very hard to fly following the numbers perfectly, I added a tolerance modifier.
Tips about fuel management, such as setting a good Bingo value, will be covered later in a dedicated article.

Raw values

All the values collected, along with charts and others, are available here. As I mentioned multiple times, these values come directly from DCS and are subject to a certain degree of tolerance due to a number of factors (such as the Wind). If you find errors or mistake feel free to point them out!

1 comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: